Do not events happening in India indicate that there is something wrong with its political character?

Posted on February 27th, 2010 by admin

(1) A former Prime Minister breaks his party’s promise – betraying his true mental makeup – to another opportunistic party and an alliance of convenience comes to an end. (2) A foreign entrant dictates the country’s total affairs – foreign and domestic – thanks to India’s traditional sycophants growing in millions. (3) An influential constituent of ruling coalition (a) hurts the religious sentiments of millions of Hindus all over the world (b) insults the Judiciary which is the only hope left for Indians and go scot-free on both counts. (3) A Muslim is said to have been murdered with police assistance for his sin of marrying a rich and influential Hindu girl from an economic dominant family. (4) Police and Politicians decide the destiny of India and Indians, ridiculing its system of democracy. Write your remedies too.

The items enlisted by the inquirer and a host of others, unerringly point out that "many things are WRONG with its political character."
We achieved independence at a very inconvenient time.Then, we rushed up to draft a costitution and became a republic within three years!
Sine then our politicians have been solely concerned with building vote banks(political engineering) rather than ’social engineering’.
The frequent tamasha of General Elections have drawn even communal parties to throw the glove!
To win elections by ‘hook’ or ‘crook’, they all indulge in illegal and immoral acts too.
Once they secure a majority, they form the govt. More often than not misrule and get a boot in the next election!
Now -a-days, the electorate wants to please all and hence the results lead to hung assembly or parliament.
Even that is circumvented by forming immoral coalitions! The honeymoon soon wears off!
Then, all talk about "morailty", which they themselves strangulated.

A question about the National Tea Party Coalition…?

Posted on February 27th, 2010 by admin

They have launched a campaign called "Hall Pass On That" to oppose President Obama speaking to school children.

They say, "Parents are also concerned as the entire program was crafted with help from the president’s White House Teaching Fellows, some of whom are activists with documented hostility towards the very tenants of our republic."

http://www.hallpassonthat.com/

My question is: How would they know that about the school teachers who worked on the program?

hard, stick with school, and do their best because that is the key to getting good jobs and succeeding in our country. How that is a socialist agenda or fostering an Obama "cultism" is beyond me. The text will be released today for concerned parents. This is just a ploy.

From the Tea Party Coalition to the Birthers, and the acid comments from Fox News commentators, Limbaugh and Palin, I think the right wing of the Republican party is having a collective mental breakdown. I’m sorry they are disappointed Obama was elected, but it’s time to get over it. It looks like sour grapes. Democrats had to put up with 8 years of Bush who, in two terms, did more harm than all our presidents put together. God only knows how we look to the international community.

How about acting like patriotic Americans and stop this mantra of "deflect, deny, delay, and destroy".

Did you hear the news?? Iraqi teachers and shopkeepers are killing fellow iraqi’s?

Posted on February 27th, 2010 by admin

according to a reliable source:

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AoigzK5.ozc8aGoiNFY_O43sy6IX?qid=20070110181954AAV0G4K
mild_irritant
"The insurgents are not terrorists. They were ordinary Iraqi citizens – shopkeepers and schoolteachers – before the invasion.

A FOREIGN power invaded their land without cause."

————————–
So, who would be the soldiers that the coalition are training? They must be the bad iraqi’s

—-

If you find a more stupid post of the day, please inform.

Your line last night about us not being at war in Iraq takes the cake for me. I’m still laughing at that stupid comment.

IS MUHAMED A PROPHET???

Posted on February 27th, 2010 by admin

A supernatural witness points to Muhammad’s prophethood
When he was three years old, two angels came and took out his heart from his chest, cleaned it with ice water, put it back and left. In doing so they supposedly prepared him for his mission on earth.

Another story which comes via Muslim Tradition mentions that after the death of his grandfather Abdu-Mutalib, Muhammad went to visit a Catholic monk with his uncle Abu-Talib. It is reported that the monk saw a cloud specifically protect Muhammad from the sun. It was then that he knew that he would be someone special.
. At the age of twenty-five he married Khadijah, a widow fifteen years his senior, who was in fact his employer. The marriage was a happy one, and two boys and four girls were born to them, though the two boys did not live to a mature age. Khadija died after twenty-five years of marriage to Muhammad. During that time Muhammad never took another wife.

Another proof of his prophethood, according to Muslims, stems from the fact that Muhammad prophesied events in the future, which then came to pass later on. Only a prophet of God could know what was going to happen in the future, and therefore Muhammad must be a prophet. Yet, the only ‘real’ prophecy recorded, which Muslims attribute to Muhammad is that found in Sura 30:1-4, where it is written:

A.L.M. The Roman Empire has been defeated. In a land close by; but they (even) after (this) defeat of theirs, will soon be victorious. Within a few years. With Allah is the decision, in the past and in the future: on that day shall the Believers rejoice.
This passage refers to the defeat of the Byzantines in Syria by the Persians under Khusran Parvis (in A.D. 615), six years before the Hijra.

The defeat of the Persians should take place soon- "in a small number of years." In light of this prediction, Abu-Bakr undertook a bet with Ubai-ibn-Khalaf that this prediction would be fulfilled within three years. But he was corrected by Muhammad, who stated that the "small number" is between three and nine years (Al-Baizawi).

Muslims tell us that the Byzantines overcame their enemies within seven years. However, the fact is that the Byzantines defeated Persia in AD 628 (Al-Baizawi’s commentary). That was twelve years after the prediction of Muhammad. Consequently, this passage does not qualify as a prophecy, particularly as the time between the prophecy and fulfilment was far too short, and in addition the event was easily predictable. The odds were only 50/50.

The other ‘prophecies’ which Muslims point to refer to Muhammad’s victories and those relating to the Qur’an itself. It is nearly impossible to establish whether these prophecies were said before their fulfilment. Besides, like the previous example, they were either easily predictable, or just war- propaganda. In this event George Bush might be called a prophet too, for he predicted that the Gulf-coalition would win the war with Iraq.

IS MUHAMED A PROPHET????????????

yes there is no doubt that prophet muhammed is the final prophet of god and he is the seal of prophets for christians to see and believe prophet muhammed Deuteronomy chapter 33 verse 2 indicate of coming of prophet muhammed in PARAN which means ancient name of MEKKE according toChristiann McKenziee j dictionary

Do you agree that there should be laws protecting kids….?

Posted on February 27th, 2010 by admin

Please read this article and then comment. Thanks!

http://ca.news.yahoo.com/s/capress/070117/national/violence_media_children_2

For those of you too "click weary" I’ll post the first paragraph here to give you an idea of what this is about:

"Canadian children are being exposed to far too much violence in music lyrics, video games and on television and need to be protected by laws similar to those that restrict the sale of tobacco to minors, a coalition of teachers and parents said Wednesday."
You can’t protect your children from everything. If you were a parent you’d know that. And it used to be that NOTHING vulgar, offensive, or with sexual content appeared on tv before 9 PM…somewhere along the line that changed.

You think when you buy a game rated for kids or teens it would have no violence but it does.

Besides, look at the crap on the computer kids can access. With laws like this in place, then they can force rules for the internet too.

How about make the GOVERNMENT responsible first…because everyone goes running to them for their right to show their boobs, have sex with whomever, etc…this seems to imply to anyone that it’s ok to put this crap all over TV stations and the radio too.
How about that rapper from Detroit who is sueing the Canadian government for 300 million because they "delay" him every time he crosses the border…geez I guess that criminal record a mile long has nothing to do with it and that SMUT he passes off for music….tell me what is a song that says "get down on your knees bitch" allowed to hit the airwaves at all!! The disgusting bastard should be in prison instead of suing for the right to air that garbage. Dickheads like Howard Stern don’t help the cause either.
You guys are so naive. You do need government. Parents are doing thier part if you read this article it doesn’t mean anything without the government backing this.

They are elected by the people and owe it to our country to maintain a level of ethics.

Government sets laws for the people. That’s its role. That’s what is wrong with kids today they have no rules at all. You will suffer for it. One day the world and it’s mess will be yours to handle.
SO DUAL, are you saying government should remove the age restrictions on drinking, the driving restriction on age, and the age of consensus on when children marry?

What a great idea! Let’s leave that to all those responsible parents who do such a great job as it is…and to their bratty children who argue it’s their right…then let’s fill them up with booze, give them the car keys and hell marry them off at 9….what a pain kids are after all…out the house and get a job you lazy good for nothing!!!
I CAN SEE YOUR PARENTS are looking over your shoulders right now too restricting you from all this smut online….tell they from me I’m proud of the wonderful job they’re doing!!!!! Keep it up!!!

Sounds like a good idea to me.

Would you like to see the ACLU have a permanent role in government?

Posted on February 27th, 2010 by admin

Matches made in HELL!!

The ACLU running the Justice department and Supreme Court and district courts, parole boards, and Education department.

Planned Parenthood/NARAL running the department of health and human services.

La Raza running the department of Interior

Al Gore running the Energy Department.

ACORN running Housing and Urban Development.

ANSWER Coalition running the Defense Department.

Wouldn’t that be wonderful??

I am a retired Detective and when I was on the job we used to refer to the ACLU as the " American Criminal Liberties Union ".

Why are the democratic and republican parties just yapping and yapping and dont get anything done?

Posted on February 27th, 2010 by admin

this whats makes me pissed.. people love to defend their own party and dont wanna hear what the other has to say… this way of doing this is really not effective as we will always have our opinions. is there an effective way of getting government to do what it should do for the people? i like the idea of coalitions. any other ideas?

They do it because we, as voters, are too stupid to vote for Independents and 3rd party candidates.

Until we start doing that, there is no reason for either Dems or Reps to do anything that actually benefits average Americans.

Filed under coalitions | 10 Comments »

Who should be HUNG–the "Coalition" for shooting them both, or the "terrorist", for using a human shield?

Posted on February 27th, 2010 by admin

This is a quote from someone else on a current Pakistan question–

"Unfortunately!Yes!The terrorists have used the border villages as safe havens to attack the coalition forces!Also the Taleban have been using innocent men women and children as shields"

What do YOU think–which of these two antagonists (if either) are in the wrong; the "terrorist" for hiding among innocents, or the "coalition", for blowing the entire crowd away? Begin.

The liars who peddle the official yarn about the events of 9/11 which was used as a pretext to invade in the first place, should be first to be called to book.

Filed under coalition | 5 Comments »

God Bless Canada , the land of the free…

Posted on February 27th, 2010 by admin

I know no one who likes the coalition idea. Why? It was not put to a vote. That’s what the libs/ndp/bloc and their supporters don’t get. In Canada we vote for our government, we do not have it rammed down our throats or otherwise imposed on us. I

The Nordic countries make up a region in Northern Europe called the Nordic region, consisting of Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway and Sweden

Right, because in Countries which often operate with coalition cabinets, they have their government rammed down their throats. People living in Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, Sweden Germany, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Turkey, Israel, New Zealand, Pakistan and India. Switzerland has been regularly oppressed by dictatorship coalition of the four strongest parties in parliament.

God bless Canada, U.S and the U.K, where freedom and democracy rings and rings and rings.

Duration : 0:1:13

Read the rest of this entry »

Iris mission 1

Posted on February 27th, 2010 by admin

The world of Iris has become a war zone. This once peaceful world is now thrown into complete chaos as military, militia, mercenary, and bandit units alike are blowing each other former ally or enemy alike apart in attempts to take control. Many wish to just see Iris free and allowed to heal, these forces are small but are binding together to form an Alliance. Many want to rule with an iron fist, or sell their world to a bigger power for money, these forces are beginning to get together to crush the alliance, if they succeed they will just further the damage after the alliance dies they will slaughter each other.

You are a former mercenary turned hero, the alliance was more then willing to pay you for your units but after being betrayed by your employers who are Coalition members, you only asked for the money to rearm your unit, the rest, you will do for the payment of vengeance! You have been given access to the best tech available on Iris in order to bring control to this place, your goals are simple, both powers have established makeshift bases in this expansive area, your goal is to destroy all coalition forces and take the base in order to secure the alliance foothold here

Tactical Notices: The alliance is very weak and mostly consisted of mix-matched units that have no long-term survivability if the base is ambushed without your support

Tactical Warnings: The unit size and abilities are UNKNOWN do not go charging in unprepared!

Duration : 0:7:22

Read the rest of this entry »

  • Categories

  • Pages

  • Tags

  • Archives

  • Meta

  •