Coalition

Http://gpspakistan.wordpress.com
QUETTA Nov 26 (APP): The federal government has tabled the long-awaited Aghaz-e-Haqooq-e-Balochistan package based on 39 points at a joint sitting of parliament. Package prepared by committee headed by Senator Raza Rabbani proposed the facilitation of the return of political exiles, the immediate release of political workers and negotiation with all stakeholders in the province. Package prepared in four categories: constitutional, political, administrative and economic mechanism recommends setting up of a fact-finding commission to investigate the circumstances that led to the death of Nawab Akbar Bugti, a judicial inquiry into the killing of three Baloch nationalist leaders, no construction of cantonments in Sui and Kohlu, withdrawing the armed forces from these areas. Terming it a positive move political Pandits are of the view that Aghaz-e-Huqooq-e-Balochistan package will help address grievances of the people of Balochistan. The PPP government started working on the package as soon as it assumed office, with a view to provide relief to the Baloch people. Balochistan package is a historic step, which will help end the feeling of deprivation among the people of the province The package was the right step towards addressing the issues of the Baloch people. APP/A.Shakoor.

Duration : 0:2:5

Read the rest of this entry »

was anti communism reponsible for the coalition of the liberal party and the country party.

yes, i do.

what are the pros and cons of these two? which one do you think is better?

or do you have any helpful links…i will be debating this topic tomorrow so anything helps!

thank you!

I’m more familiar with the US where we have a 2-Party system, and both Parities always have a considerable amount of influence. Often the President (head of the Executive Branch of government) is from a different Party from the majority in Congress. Even when the majority in Congress is the same Party as the President, the minority Party is by no means powerless. This system includes the concept of the "loyal opposition." This means that the Party that loses will accept the decision of the majority (even if they don’t like it) and will not attempt a coup. They will work within the system to regain power, and they always get it sooner or later.
The coalition system happens when there are a number of different Parties, none of which has a chance at the majority. They have to negotiate among themselves as to whom and what they will support. France is well known for this system, in which Parliament consists of many Parties ranged Right to Left. I certainly prefer this to a single Party system in which there is virtually no choice. But I’m inclined to think the 2-Party system is more practical.

They have launched a campaign called "Hall Pass On That" to oppose President Obama speaking to school children.

They say, "Parents are also concerned as the entire program was crafted with help from the president’s White House Teaching Fellows, some of whom are activists with documented hostility towards the very tenants of our republic."

http://www.hallpassonthat.com/

My question is: How would they know that about the school teachers who worked on the program?

hard, stick with school, and do their best because that is the key to getting good jobs and succeeding in our country. How that is a socialist agenda or fostering an Obama "cultism" is beyond me. The text will be released today for concerned parents. This is just a ploy.

From the Tea Party Coalition to the Birthers, and the acid comments from Fox News commentators, Limbaugh and Palin, I think the right wing of the Republican party is having a collective mental breakdown. I’m sorry they are disappointed Obama was elected, but it’s time to get over it. It looks like sour grapes. Democrats had to put up with 8 years of Bush who, in two terms, did more harm than all our presidents put together. God only knows how we look to the international community.

How about acting like patriotic Americans and stop this mantra of "deflect, deny, delay, and destroy".

http://goLIVEmiami.com FFPC fundraiser to support lobbying the Florida Legislature to bring back a stronger film incentive program. Meet the young sponsors of the event, models and film makers Adam and Matthew Ziff and Michelle Minkin and Sam E. Goldberg from S&M Radio at idobiradio.com. You Go Where I Go, http://goLIVEmiami.com

Duration : 0:2:24

Read the rest of this entry »

yes, it would.

Apart from 3 policies regarding
* Slacker immigration and asylum laws
* An anti war-stance
* And a mutual dislike for Israel,
Would the far left and Muslim community not clash on every other policy?
Respect would increase taxes for small businesses, they are opposed to second homes for "buy to let property’s" both being business sectors the Muslim communities are involved in. They advocate animal cruelty reforms that contravene Halal butcher’s method of killing. They champion gay rights and intend a massive budget increase for the needs of gay/lesbian people. They are vehemently pro-choice and anti faith schools of any sort and despise sectarianism, and yet they proclaim themselves "The Party for Muslims" is that "Muslims not Hindu’s" because that sounds sectarian to me.

I’m quite happy for people to vote for however they want, but a socialist/Islam alliance doesn’t seem to fit.

Your views please

The respect part yhas split into two factions one led by Galloway and his ’spivlamist’ allies and the other one that is merely a front for the Socialist Workers Party.

The truth of the matter is that the left in Britain is politically dead and so taken up with minority groups as to make their political position incomprehensible to any sane person. It is not clear why this is but it does mean that in real terms they end up supporting people well to the right of the BNP. In a way it is best viewed as an extension of the middle class western liberals guilt and self-hatred.

Dana Loesch of the St. Louis Tea Party Coalition appears on Greta Van Susteren’s show to react to being painted as part of a “mob”.

“It is absolutely insulting,” she says. “If I were in this for the money, I would have gone and worked for ACORN.”

Duration : 0:5:0

Read the rest of this entry »

So a multi party system does nto share responsibility in the actions of the govt? In other words, each party is respectively responsible for their own policies and action?

No. A multi-party system refers to an electoral process where any number of parties can participate, and the one that garners the most votes wins control of the government (or, as in our case, a given branch of the government).

A coalition gov’t is what happens in a parlimentary system where no single party has a majority, and therefore cannot control the government on their own. They then form alliances with one or more like-minded parties to reach a majority, and then share the responisibilites of rule.

Response to additions: Each party is responsible for its own positions and platform, and in a multiparty system each of those parties is competing to control 50% or more of the gov’t, and to promote its own position whether or not it has majority control (of course, with that control, it’s much, much, easier). If no party can achieve the 50% mark, then a coalition has to be formed.

say for example party a had a majority of seats in parliament, if party b and party c put together would make up more seats then they can form a kind of coalition and therefore stop party a from passing any laws?

Yes, but the public would be very unhappy their votes being wasted, which would likely drive more voters to party a, and these kinds of alliances usually fall apart within 6 months anyway, and nothing wil get done untill the next election, as nobody will have them numbers to guarentee voting something through.