Who should be HUNG–the "Coalition" for shooting them both, or the "terrorist", for using a human shield?
Posted on February 27th, 2010 by admin
This is a quote from someone else on a current Pakistan question–
"Unfortunately!Yes!The terrorists have used the border villages as safe havens to attack the coalition forces!Also the Taleban have been using innocent men women and children as shields"
What do YOU think–which of these two antagonists (if either) are in the wrong; the "terrorist" for hiding among innocents, or the "coalition", for blowing the entire crowd away? Begin.
The liars who peddle the official yarn about the events of 9/11 which was used as a pretext to invade in the first place, should be first to be called to book.
February 28th, 2010 at 3:55 am
The correct term, is "hanged". Otherwise we might think you’re referring to relative size of the males.
References :
February 28th, 2010 at 4:34 am
More to the point is -
What is the ‘coalition’ doing there in the first place?? (invading another country)
It’s not about ‘terrorism’ that’s for sure…
References :
February 28th, 2010 at 5:06 am
Hang anyone who hides behind Innocent Men, Women and Children and then claims to fights for the very same Innocent people lives it just cost.
No cause is worthy if the fighters cannot stand and fight with-out first having to hide behind Innocent Men, Women and Children, what-ever its cause it has no Honor, value or substance.
References :
February 28th, 2010 at 5:53 am
None, but both are certainly in the wrong.
References :
February 28th, 2010 at 6:03 am
The liars who peddle the official yarn about the events of 9/11 which was used as a pretext to invade in the first place, should be first to be called to book.
References :